Dear Naseem Zahra Sahiba,
After watching your last night program, I am writing this open letter to you.
I consider you genuinely a well versed analyst. But I am sorry to say and I must share with you. Do you think Mutiullah and Malik , Shoaib Shaheen are analysts. Ma’am in the name of freedom of speech and journalism all anchors and reporters are playing havoc with Pakistan and Pakistanis. The program of Javed Chaudhry reflects his calibre. Honestly think, is he not responsible for showing intolerance on electronic media.
Who sells ” kushtas” after long track of journalism, do you think he deserves to be journalist? Irshad Bhatti, Imran Riaz, Shahid Masud, Hamid Mir, Kashif Abbasi, Maher Bukhari, Habib Akram, Athar Kazmi, Aftab Iqbal etc are journalists and analysts? They are biased people. I remember Ardsher Cowsjee ,a real journalist, I have read Ghazi Salauddin , an unbiased out class analyst , I read your articles repleted with competence.
Unfortunately,rating and earning of money under the glamour of camera has effected your program as well. You have compromised on the selection of guests perhaps due to this rating and pressure of media house. When you demand freedom of speech, first demand it to your media house owner to invite genuine analysts , experts and professionals then you all journalists deserve to demand it to state.
How Important is the Accused for Whom an Anchor & MNA be Present @ Police Station?
Freedom of speech and journalism is relevant to the society, human beings and personal responsibilities. Responsibilities and rights are reciprocal. The responsibility of a journalist is his / her right. If a journalist forgets his responsibility ,he/she uses the narrative of a party,promotes it, he /she is a YouTuber, his /her aim is to accumulate wealth by hook or by crook. When he /she is apprehended for his /her role contrary to the role of journalist, according to his /her party this is victimization.
Mutiullah Jan has a genuine issue after the live broadcaast from SC, he has been deprived of providing ” lies” to his audience. I think reporter must not speak on sub-judicious cases but unluckily every anchor person has has his own desire to see another ” Tamasha” to sell that in the evening in electronic media and his YouTube channel.
ANCHOROCRACY AT ITS WORST-OPINION MAKERS TURN OUT TO BE SAVIORS OF LAW BREAKERS
Ma’am , how an anchor person ,can be an analyst? In which country does it happen? Which electronic channel in the world stage a court in the talk shows where pigmies speculates on judgments of the court on a case? I think, it happens in Pakistan only, where Mutiullah Jan, Abdul Qatum Siddique, Hassan Ayub, Hamid Mir, and all anchors issue decree of a sub-judicious matter. This is Pakistan only where all discussion in the evening is based on assumption, if this happens it will result in that. Is this journalism? Honestly tell us ma’am. You are really an educated journalist.
You are a highly qualified and genuine journalist and analyst, please let me know, do you call an expert? Who is a real analyst?
In my life I have seen only Prof.Dr.Hassan Askari on Pakistani electronic media screen as a genuine political analyst.
Sorry to say, all anchors have become jack of all trades but master of none. They speak even on medical science as analysts. They predict even earthquakes will occur.
The anchors analyze the economy on assumptions. Are they economists? This is their assumptions that has destroyed the economy sue to false forecasts based on their farce of talk show.
This is totally unfair and disastrous for our homeland.
Imran Showered 195 Million PKR on “Global Village Space” – Dr Moeed Denies the Amount
Advocate Shoaib Shaheen was talking about elections within three months. May I ask him to reply why did PTI dissolve their governments in KPK and the Punjab before the expiry date of assemblies.
Did any anchor remind them about their conspiracy to create a permanent problem for the federation forever.
If the election held then, you know well that results of those elections always affect the results of the national assembly and probably the federation disintegrates due to rapidly arising sense of manipulation of elections in Pakistan.Did only PTI have the representation in those two assemblies?
Justice Athar Min Allah :s note is evidence of this stance.
I would request you for becoming the first drop of rain to invite experts of relevant fields ,genuine analysts ,and professors of universities for real analysis.
I believe you will give up to invite these stereotypes pigmies in your program.
My concern is that electronic media need to devise its own code of conduct. You , Shaukat Paracha and Talat Hussain like journalists must take the initiative that they will call only experts, keep their program free of biases and prejudices ,make efforts to bring the tolerance and modesty back to our lives to save and train our young generations.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Best regards
Dr.Nasir Hussain Bukhari
NEO Tv Violating Content Category -IHC Dismissed TV’s Plea -Now Stop News & Current Affairs -PEMRA
